I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country – George Patton
I usually talk about this after some time into the article, but I have to praise the screenplay of the movie by Francis Coppola and Edmund North. I knew about Patton’s war exploits in detail and the historical accuracy of this movie is remarkable. Just thought I should mention it.
What a riveting performance by George Scott ! I had only seen him in Dr. Strangelove before but I never really understood that he had the potential to give such a performance. Not once scene does he falter, not one scene. I have seen some of George Patton’s real clips and I felt as if his living soul had taken abode in George Scott. Karl Malden was very good but there are some scenes in which he gets over-the-top melodramatic. Micheal Bates is horrible. i don’t know why but he sucked very badly. Micheal Strong looks too much like Leonard Nimoy, okay so he freaked me out.
It is so uplifting to know that movies of such scale were made during the 70’s. It feels very very real, believe me. But does the film drag too much ? Hell yeah. The film drags too much. Hugh Fowler won an Oscar for best editing for Patron. Why ? If I had been the editor of this movie, the running time would have been 143 minutes. I could have cut out numerous, numerous scenes. And there is a scene in which Patton says that the enemy army is going to attack from west because it seems the least probable to everyone. This are history defining events and he just makes decisions based just on his instincts ?
The score of this movie is awesome. Haunting music supplemented this movie very well and in the portions that I was bored, I listened to the superb score.
Patton is never deciphered. He keeps to compare himself to army greats. He fights with his own alter-ego. But the only explanation given is that he is a born to be army man. That was a tad unsatisfying.
But, the climax of this movie is very emotional. It felt just like Kill The Messenger. It was so sad that a hero so great went unsung in his life. It is partially Patton’s own fault but still it is was an undeserved ending for the riveting genius.
Patton is a detailed sketch of the unsung military genius which is engrossing at first, but then a bad case of editing makes the movie a tad tedious, but George Scott’s prodigious performance doesn’t let us to take our eyes of the screen, yet the movie doesn’t do complete justice to its running time.
Rating : 8.1 / 10
THANKS FOR READING. IF YOU HAVE LIKED/HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS / HAVE ANY DOUBTS, PLEASE SHARE. I WILL RESPOND TO IT AS SOON AS I CAN. AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE. YOU CAN FOLLOW ME ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE TOO https://www.facebook.com/pages/Demanded-Critical-Reviews/1565666967024477?ref=hl YOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL ME ON firstname.lastname@example.org OR email@example.com
Photo Rights : Google Images, Wikipedia
Copyright : All written content on this site, unless otherwise noted, has been created by the website owner. As such, the content is the property of the website owner. This content is protected by Indian and international copyright laws. If you wish to reproduce, re-post, or display any of our content on your own site please only do so if you also provide a link back to the source page on this website and properly attribute authorship. Our preference is that you seek our permission before doing so. If you see anything on this website that has not been properly attributed to its originator please contact me. In response, I will attempt to correct the attribution of the offending material or remove and/or replace it. All material on this website is posted in accordance with the limitations set forward by the Information Technology Act, 2000. If a documented copyright owner so requests, their material will be removed from published display, although the author reserves the right to provide linkage to that material or to a source for that material. As a website devoted to discussing and reviewing movies and television I will at times, for illustrative purposes, present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for purposes such as criticism, comment, and research. The website owner believes that this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material because the articles published on this website are distributed for entertainment purposes.