What Is The Greatest Cinematic Experience I Have Ever Had ?

What is it to have a great cinematic experience? As much as the art it derives its existence from, a great cinematic experience is subjective to its very core. I have read various testimonials of couples on the internet talking about how Norman Jewison’s Moonstruck made them fall in love with each other. I, on the other hand would readily make a case that watching a submarine fight while sitting on a beach would be a far better way to spend one’s time than watching the same movie in question.

In these few recent years during which I have fallen madly in love with this art form, the question of how a movie is perceived differently by every individual has hounded me persistently. And it’s not just confined to either a negative or positive response. Even to this day, the lovers of Francis Ford Coppola’s haunting masterpiece Apocalypse Now are debating whether to hail it as a pro or anti war movie.

One of the most pivotal and obvious reasons a movie may allure some and parry others is primarily because of its subject matter. A person who hasn’t gone through heartbreak may not think twice of Marc Webb’s (500) Days Of Summer after having seen it. However, it will stand out as a favorite of one who has experienced this heart-wrenching ordeal because the movie illustrates his life situation, which induces a personal experience for him in the cinema hall rather than a mere steady flow of 24 frames per second.

Another factor causing a major divide among the audiences is one’s perception of cinema itself. A friend of mine who lives a floor above hails Micheal Bay’s Transformers as the greatest movie he has ever seen. This opinion of his was obviously met by me with great dissent and inept sarcasm (Micheal Bay is so dumb he got locked in a grocery store and starved). But the more I think about it now, I don’t see his opinion to be flawed at all for when he walks into a cinema theater, all he expects to take from it seems to be unabashed entertainment which Bay seems to offer.

And as I realize now, I could go on and on about the various factors which seem to be responsible for this psychological phenomena, but none of them would be a concrete factor which one can consider the principal reason for a person to either hate or love a movie. In the end I truly believe, a movie is to a person what he is or has been.

But, dear reader, it was your inquisitiveness towards my own personal experience which brought you to this paragraph. And the answer to the titular question is a relatively well-known movie from Paul Thomas Anderson titled Magnolia. Why ?

Because after watching it, I knew the movie had changed me irreversibly, but I had no idea how. Many of the meaningful moments in our lifetime seem to ascertain themselves with deep, life changing philosophical depth, but somehow, the most important among them always seem to evade their greater meaning from us, as if to make us revisit and learn from them from time to time.

One of my greater fears I have as a human being is I have depleted my quota for the emotions a human being feels in his lifetime and what I am feeling now is just lesser version of what I have already felt. But after watching Magnolia, I knew I was feeling something deeper than anything I had felt, but I also knew I would never have the words to describe it.

For me watching Magnolia wasn’t just a cinematic experience, but more or less, a life experience. And a profound one too.

(Share your greatest cinematic experience and your thoughts on the different perception of movies in the comments)

THANKS FOR READING. IF YOU HAVE LIKED/HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS / HAVE ANY  DOUBTS, PLEASE SHARE. I WILL RESPOND TO IT AS SOON AS I CAN. AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE. YOU CAN FOLLOW ME ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE TOO https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100011549616628 YOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL ME ON castlebang786@gmail.com OR favebook2011@rediffmail.comPhoto Rights : Google Images, Wikipedia

Copyright : All written content on this site, unless otherwise noted, has been created by the website owner. As such, the content is the property of the website owner. This content is protected by Indian and international copyright laws. If you wish to reproduce, re-post, or display any of our content on your own site please only do so if you also provide a link back to the source page on this website and properly attribute authorship. Our preference is that you seek our permission before doing so. If you see anything on this website that has not been properly attributed to its originator please contact me. In response, I will attempt to correct the attribution of the offending material or remove and/or replace it. All material on this website is posted in accordance with the limitations set forward by the Information Technology Act, 2000. If a documented copyright owner so requests, their material will be removed from published display, although the author reserves the right to provide linkage to that material or to a source for that material. As a website devoted to discussing and reviewing movies and television I will at times, for illustrative purposes, present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available  for purposes such as criticism, comment, and research. The website owner believes that this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material because the articles published on this website are distributed for entertainment purposes.

Advertisements

The Cinema Of Andrei Tarkovsky

There was a time when visual suzerains held cinema-going audiences spellbound with their every frame a painting modus operandi, hiding beneath these visual orgasms philosophical undertones to be sought after and admired, and in case of savants, comprehended. When I first chanced upon this blogathon, the name that popped up in my mind instantly was that of Quentin Tarantino, a true master of fiery dialogue and the power it unleashes on the minds of the audience. However, if I forsake for this moment my preference for the verbal aspect of cinema than the visual, I cannot seem to think of any other name than that of Russian film-making’s prized gem christened Andrei Tarkovsky.

I belong to the 21st century. Consummated by fast-paced movies, this is a generation which seems to forgive and even adore directors who forsake art if they seem to provide ample entertainment. So obviously, when I was introduced to the cinema of the likes of Ingmar Bergman and Terrence Malick and Bela Tarr, the reaction was reminiscent of a drug addict’s to rehab. However, when the sepia-coloured screen faded in, I was completely mesmerized.

I am talking about my viewing experience of the 1979 classic of Tarkovsky’s titled Stalker. There are very movies which penetrate deep into one’s soul and create an atmosphere which forces one to introspect on the very foundation of one’s existence. Stalker was one of the very few gems that conjured that atmosphere for me. As the movie progressed deep within the Zone, towards the room where one’s innermost desires were satisfied, I experienced my own subconscious tracing its path towards my soul and exposing a facet of it. A facet so veracious in nature that I was taken aback by the years I spent pretending to be oblivious of its existence. When Stalker neared its end, I was left sobbing inconsolably. Maybe when we look so deep into ourselves, sadness seems to be the only emotion invoked. Even if I say Stalker changed me irrevocably, I believe it still would be a gross understatement to the emotional impact this masterpiece by Andrei Tarkovsky unleashes.

But I believe that you, dear reader, still have a pertinent question hanging on the back of your minds. Why Tarkovsky? Why chose him over Welles or Ford or Hitchcock or Kubrick? Your question holds a firm validity since none of his other movies have even come close to Stalker’s greatness. The Mirror seems to be an artistic mess (a description I believe Tarkovsky intended it to be characterized by). His Solaris is an imperfect masterpiece in my opinion, oscillating between Tarkovsky’s and Stainslaw’s (the writer of the novel on which the movie is based) vision, in the end delivering a work-in-progress feel when the screen fades.

Well, the answer to the aforementioned question is crystal clear when I think about it. All directors have a distinctively personal work, say Malick’s Tree Of Life or Fellini’s 8 ½. With Tarkovsky, it was always personal. He intended every movie of his to be a pathway for the viewer into his own being, various cinematic models reminiscent of the pathways John Cusack’s character finds in Being John Malkovich.

All of Tarkovsky’s works were meditative in their nature, with soothing visual imagery at every turn.  It was not an attempt to lure the intellectuals or instill in his movies metaphorical subplots. On the contrary, it was his daring attempt to make art accessible to every layman. An opportunity to analyze and meditate upon the events which had transpired before. Unlike all other intellectuals who have graced the cine industry, Tarkovsky actually wanted ‘everyone’ to understand.

http://phyllislovesclassicmovies.blogspot.in/2017/03/announcing-favorite-director-blogathon.html

A Memoir About A Best Friend – Robin Williams

Featured image

I was watching Star World one day and suddenly an advertisement pops up and a scene from the sitcom ‘The Crazy Ones’ is playing. And then it shows scenes of Good Will Hunting, Aladdin, Mrs. Doubtfire, Fisher King, Dead Poets Society, Hook and finally concludes with ‘Goooooooooooood Morning Vietnam !’ and shows ‘THANK YOU ROBIN WILLIAMS 1951-2014’. And, my eyes were transfixed on the screen with utter shock. Completely shaken, I looked at the newspapers and there on the third page was an article titled ‘FROM MORK TO ALADDIN, WILLIAMS MADE THE WORLD LAUGH’ and I cried. One of the greatest shocks of lives had overtook me. My Robin was dead. The guy who inspired me, the guy who made my laugh, the guy who made me cry, he was gone.

Robin Williams is one of the greatest actors of all time. And he had an unshaken influence over me. I always considered Robin as one of my best friends. I heard Robin’s voice in Aladdin first. And his impersonations and his one-liners and everything about the Genie made me laugh. He was the best-friend I always wanted. Not just the wish giving part, but a friend who gives assistance in getting a girl, going through hard times and also makes me laugh, it was a dream.

Featured image

Next, I saw Good Morning Vietnam. What a movie ! Robin Williams’  rapid-fire improvisations along with his impersonations and that legendary quote made it one hell of an experience. Williams deserved an Oscar for that role and Academy once again messed up. Robin made us cry and laugh and even showed us the horrors of the war through that classic.

Featured image

Next was Dead Poets Society. I cried so much during that movie. It was so inspiring. That thought about seizing the day has still got me. The scene in which all the students stand up in the climax on their benches and shout ‘Oh Captain ! My Captain !’. I was left crying throughout that scene. The way he got to those students, defending them from getting crushed by their parents’  ambitions. He gave them hope and made them love education. He was the teacher I always hoped for. Not a teacher, but a friend of his students.

Featured image

And then came Good Will Hunting. A movie as flawless as it gets. My dude Chris Stuckmann was brought back into life during a difficult phase by this movie and I love it for that. This movie is a classic and will definitely make you cry. Such a brilliant performance by Williams. He is so good, especially that scene when Sean says to Will that it is not his fault, I could not stop sobbing. Williams deserved an Oscar for that role & he got it. I always wished I had someone like that who I could talk to about my interests and my passions and my life and he would be such a awesome listener. The movie discusses so many issues and tackles it in such an inspiring way.

Featured imageFeatured image

Robin Williams was would do anything as long as it kept the audiences happy. He was the only guy out there who really wanted to see a smile on everyone’s faces. He was one of the best human beings ever born. He is one of the very few celebrities I respect and love and adore and idolize. He inspired us all and made us laugh and I think our laughter was the power that he required to survive. Like Obama said ‘ Robin Williams came into our lives as an alien but ended up touching every human element ‘. Robin will be missed as long as cinema will sustain and Robin’s movies will continue to make us cry, laugh and  get inspired. Robin Williams was more than a man, he was hope himself. One of God’s most precious gifts to the world.

Quentin Tarantino- A Memoir

Featured image

Quentin Tarantino has his own share of haters and lovers- I belong to the latter. I love Quentin Tarantino ! I have begun making a ‘My Favourite Movies’ List and if my favourite film-maker is decided on the basis of the movies they have in my favourite movies list, four director take the 1st spot: Steven Spielberg (Schindler’s List Last Crusade, Raiders of the Lost Ark), Peter Jackson (Lord of the Rings trilogy), Ron Howard (Rush, The Da Vinci Code, A Beautiful Mind), Christopher Nolan (The Dark Knight, Inception, Interstellar), David Fincher (Zodiac, Se7en and The Social Network) and Quentin Tarantino (Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs, Django Unchained) . I am sure that Steven Spielberg will take the first spot gradually, well because I haven’t watched Jaws, Jurassic Park, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Munich, E.T (yeah,kill me!) and also the fact that I am still in a debacle of whether I should include Lincoln in my list. Ron Howard may also get in there because I am in a fix whether to include Angels and Demons and Nolan too has got a chance with the remaining parts of  the Dark Knight and Prestige, but Tarantino is one of the most special ones.

Quentin Tarantino had very humble beginnings. He loved movies since he was a teenager. He dropped out of high school and took up a job at a video store which gave him a lot of time to work on a script he had in his mind and from that customer-less video store did we get the masterpiece ‘Reservoir Dogs’ .

I don’t particularly like violence, I despise action movies and I oppose profanity in movies. And a Quentin Tarantino movie has all of that, and I still consider them great. That speaks a lot for itself. My first acquaintance with Tarantino came along with a newspaper article from a guy who loved the violence in Tarantino. Naturally, I despised him and googled Tarantino and the first thing that came alone was Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction.

I chose Reservoir Dogs, it was only 90 minutes long. I thought it would be easy to bear a short horrible movie with people killing each other, dudes yelling ‘ mother……’ in every sentence and a stupid plot. Instead, I got a movie I was literally blown over by. It sort of made me ignore the profanities in every sentence and the violence throughout the movie. How do you make a movie about a bank-heist without showing the bank-heist and still make it awesome? Ask Tarantino. The movie was so stylish. Ah, the style, in Tarantino movies ! Like the boys walking down the street in the opening, it was good ! It was very fortunate the script of the movie reached the hands of Harvey Keitel with which began the Tarantino- Avary gang which shook the 90’s. The movie actually gave an emotional side to it with Harvey Keitel and Tim Roth and had a perfect plot and is now considered the greatest independent movie of all time. And after watching the movie did I come to know that it was Tarantino’s debut feature. And if someone’s debut feature is a movie like that, you know something great’s coming up from this guy. (Exception, M.N.Shyamalan- He made the Sixth Sense and Signs, and then what happened is a bigger mystery than the Holy Grail)

Reservoir Dogs released and received mixed reviews. Ebert didn’t like it and if you read the original reviews of Reservoir Dogs by many critics, half of the total content of the review is about the ear-cutting scene, which was not even shown on screen. The movie was considered an attempt to glorify violence but that actually helped because all the dudes went to see the movie and they liked it and started the word-of-mouth publicity of Reservoir Dogs which culminated into the movie being a financial success at the box-office . The movie achieved a cult status and paved the formation of Tarantino fans. The critics too later praised the movie later and accepted that many of them weren’t ready for the non-conventional story telling. After watching Reservoir Dogs, I surprisingly gave Tarantino the license to use all that I despise.

Then, in 1994 came ‘Pulp Fiction’. The movie, along with ‘The Shawshank Redemption’ and ‘Forrest Gump’ was the most influential movie of the 90’s. Every aspect of this black-comedy crime drama was acclaimed. Roger Ebert gave it a 4-rating and added it to his ‘Great Movies’ list. Every critic loved it. I loved it the first time I saw it. But, it did make me wonder, why is it regarded Tarantino’s best? This thought dragged me into a second viewing of the movie and I got my answer. I loved it more the second time. This movie is made for second viewing. Which movie has the best dialogues in cinematic history ? – Pulp Fiction. They are so quotable. I love saying that dialogue of Yolanda over and over again ” If any of you fu….. pricks move, and I’ll execute every mother……. last one of you”. That dialogue followed by the ‘Taxi’ theme, it doesn’t get cooler than this. You actually become afraid of Jules because in the scene when Butch enters his flat and (Spoiler), I was like ‘Get out there ! Get out of there ! If Vincent’s there, so must be Jules’. Every scene is iconic in this classic. In privacy, I love to imitate Vincent’s moves in the dance scene. And, it is very funny. That scene when Vincent gives Mia adrenalin is one of the funniest scenes I have ever scene and also the aftermath of the scene is also very funny. And it was the worst decision of the Academy to give the Best Picture to Forrest Gump. I wouldn’t have minded Shawshank getting it, but really ?

Then, came the Kill Bill series and Jackie Brown and Four Rooms and Inglorious Basterds, which I cannot write about because unfortunately, I still haven’t got my hands on them. But, these movies cemented Tarantino’s position as one of the greatest film-makers of all time and Jackie Brown made him a critical favourite too.

But then came Django Unchained, Tarantino’s spaghetti western which proved out to be a great critical and commercial success. The movie gained Tarantino his second Oscar for best screenplay, and the movie got a Best Picture nomination too. This movie is undoubtedly one of the coolest movies of all time. The performances in this movie are splendid and this time, the supporting actors outshone the leading man. Christopher Waltz and Leonardo Dicaprio were terrifying in their roles and ‘The Good,The Bad,The Ugly’ influence sparkles throughout the movie. And dialogues were a treat, especially ‘I like the way you die boy’. This movie was one hell of a watch.

Tarantino makes movies as a movie lover. Once he got his license to continue making movies his style, he put in his movies all that he ever wanted to see in a movie and just shoved it in our faces and said ‘This is my type of movie and you either like it or you do not’. And everyone loved the end-product.

Tarantino is undoubtedly one of the greatest film-makers and one of my favourite film-makers all time. And this is to Tarantino haters ‘You may not love his movies, but can you deny his influence in the world of cinema? ‘

THANKS FOR READING. IF YOU HAVE LIKED/HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS/HAVE ANY  DOUBTS, PLEASE SHARE. I WILL RESPOND TO IT AS SOON AS I CAN. AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE. YOU CAN FOLLOW ME ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE TOO https://www.facebook.com/pages/Demanded-Critical-Reviews/1565666967024477?ref=hl YOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL ME ON castlebang786@gmail.com OR favebook2011@rediffmail.com .