American Graffiti Review

With college so nigh, I am doing what probably all my other colleagues are doing right now, fretting about the uncertain future and remembering the days of stability and security of high school. While on this futile journey of nostalgia, I have come across a truth about myself which on the whole doesn’t seem to fit with the perception I have of myself as a person. What I have realized is I don’t miss high school. One bit.

Today, I visited my school for a reunion of sorts. As I went through this swarm of people who I had spent almost twelve years of life with, I have never felt so alienated in my entire life. Adults reminisce about high school quite fondly, some wishing more than anything else to go back to those days. On the contrary, I realize what an exercise in futility it all was – wasting time learning stuff I would never use, making friends who haven’t had half the decency to call me in almost three months. But, there is something valuable that lingers on – moments.

Moments that I have collected throughout my school years are treasures for when every single one of them was materializing, it felt as if my life wouldn’t be the same after them. That’s what makes American Graffiti so relatable in contrast to Dazed & Confused. Coming from a country where parents are more conservative than religions in question, the focus Lucas has on how the characters consider a fleeting image of a beautiful blonde whispering something a life-changing moment really hits me.

The reason why American Graffiti seems so endearing is without a doubt its characters, all seemingly clueless about their life. When it ended, there was nothing more I wanted to do than go to these and characters and whisper in their ears that they would have all the perspective they want in a month or two.

Maybe this isn’t much of a review, but it should read as one, a highly positive one considering how personal the impact of this movie is. And in the end, Lucas leaves us with a word of wisdom. For me, it was that nostalgia is a dirty liar that insists things were better than they. For lots of others, it was that nostalgia is an ephemeral composition of disjointed memories. Basically saying, if you are on a date, and you grin while your girlfriend looks grim when the credits roll, you guys have some serious thinking to do.

https://chrissturhann.blogspot.in/2017/05/announcing-summer-movie-blogathon.html?showComment=1496810819991#c1000212083715983404

 

The Wizard Of Oz Reviewed & Analyzed

The fact that a MGM musical is still celebrated by cinema lovers world over is an astonishing certitude. But after watching The Wizard Of Oz, I laugh in the face of the qualms I had regarding this movie before watching it. There isn’t a movie worthy enough of its position in world cinema than this adaptation of the Frank Baum classic by Victor Fleming.

I won’t get myself in the trouble of trying to explain its plot for the moment, for it’s as famous as the movie itself and so silly yet genius that I haven’t yet developed such a mastery of English language that it can be summarized by me within a paragraph.

The movie is a celebration of everything that we love about fantasies – characters reeking of innocence in a world which doesn’t. But rather than praising its beautiful and hilarious songs, the wonderful production design or the fabulous performances, I would much like to dedicate this post to why this MGM musical of 1939 still holds its ground in a world so strongly inhibited by the likes of Kubrick and Hitchcock and everyone else. And the only reason which seems to transpires before me except for the historical importance it reeks of for the use of Technicolor is the plot of the movie.

So, the movie’s central protagonist is Dorothy Gale who as you might know, unless you have been living under a rock for the entire course of your lifetime, gets transported by a cyclone to the land of Oz where she meets the Scarecrow (one who wishes for a brain), Tin Man (one who wishes for a heart) and the Cowardly Lion (one who wishes for courage). Together, they embark on the journey to Crystal Palace, to meet Oz who will fulfil all their desires. (A paragraph which seems to contradict my earlier statement about summarizing the plot of this movie in a paragraph, but believe me, reading this and thinking you now know the entirety of the plot of this movie would be to look at one brick of the Great Wall Of China and say that’s all there is to it)

The Scarecrow, Tin Man and Lion for me seem to epitome the innermost desires of Dorothy’s which seems to give the entire movie a surreal underlining which I will go into later. The Scarecrow seems to be a metaphorical representation of Dorothy’s yearning, or more better a child’s yearning, to be considered equal in his/her intelligence by the adults. In the beginning one can see how Dorothy’s family members seem to dispose of her troubles without giving it a moment’s thought, most probably giving her the idea that they consider her asinine, and thus the yearning to be intelligent.

The origin of Cowardly Lion can be traced back to when Zeke advises Dorothy to be a little brave while facing Almira Gulch. Dorothy’s reluctance to accept her consternation about Gulch seems to be the reason why the Cowardly Lion seems so unabating in making his cowardly nature so obtrusive.

Then what about the Tin Man who wishes for a heart to feel with, a quality which Dorothy seems so abound of ? I believe this is her yearning for Miss Almira Gulch, which further affirms her goodness.  Although the Wicked Witch of the West seems to be a representation of Gulch I believe it is restricted here to only her physicality and her hate for Toto. Tin Man here possesses the same yearning which Dorothy wishes came true for Gulch as well, thus making him a projection of the Gulch Dorothy wants her to be.

And about Oz itself ? It seems much to be a work of Dorothy’s subconscious rather than a parallel reality. The fact that the passage of time in the dream world is much faster than compared to the real world also explains the length of the journey as well. It seems Dorothy’s subconscious creates a world of imagination, inhibits it with characters which are reflections of her own self and introspect about her existence.

Or is this reading too much into nothing ? Is my chain of thought reminiscent of the way the adults in the movie reject the notion of Oz at the end of the movie ?

Whatever it may be, the creation of a child’s innocent subconscious or an unimaginable reality, The Wizard Of Oz is one of the most delightful movies to have ever come out and had me from that moment where Aunt Em says to Almira that ‘Miss Gulch, I now know exactly what I think about you, but I can’t say it because I am a Catholic’.

RATING :- 9.4 / 10

THANKS FOR READING. IF YOU HAVE LIKED/HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS / HAVE ANY  DOUBTS, PLEASE SHARE. I WILL RESPOND TO IT AS SOON AS I CAN. AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE. YOU CAN FOLLOW ME ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE TOO https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100011549616628 YOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL ME ON castlebang786@gmail.com OR favebook2011@rediffmail.com

Photo Rights : Google Images, Wikipedia

Copyright : All written content on this site, unless otherwise noted, has been created by the website owner. As such, the content is the property of the website owner. This content is protected by Indian and international copyright laws. If you wish to reproduce, re-post, or display any of our content on your own site please only do so if you also provide a link back to the source page on this website and properly attribute authorship. Our preference is that you seek our permission before doing so. If you see anything on this website that has not been properly attributed to its originator please contact me. In response, I will attempt to correct the attribution of the offending material or remove and/or replace it. All material on this website is posted in accordance with the limitations set forward by the Information Technology Act, 2000. If a documented copyright owner so requests, their material will be removed from published display, although the author reserves the right to provide linkage to that material or to a source for that material. As a website devoted to discussing and reviewing movies and television I will at times, for illustrative purposes, present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available  for purposes such as criticism, comment, and research. The website owner believes that this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material because the articles published on this website are distributed for entertainment purposes

Stand By Me

A year ago, me and my close friend named Amogh, were requested by the principal of our school to represent our school in a science fair. A science fair is as interesting for 14 year-olds as watching a submarine race standing on a beach. Both of us, being huge fans of Boston Legal, went through the rules and regulations of the competition as thoroughly as we should have gone over our school textbooks. And we struck gold. There was a provision by which we could get three more people in our project. And (spoiler alert!) we obviously did. With our whole gang in the project, we started it on a holiday. The day began with the project and eventually faded into conversations about crushes, Ip Man, and ended with a game of darts. Somewhere along, we had done the project as well. The very next day, we broke it.

Eventually, long story short, we spent half our school semester bunking classes to make it again. What amazes me is that on the last day, we were all laughing hysterically recounting our memories but departed to our classes with tears in our eyes. We had connected and I had felt, this is a bond that will never break in my lifetime. A year after, I am ignoring one of them, and two of them have become, just faces in the hall. But, the remaining two are my best friends. These are the memories that race through my mind when Gordie Lachance utters ‘Friends come in and out of your life like busboys in a restaurant‘.

Rob Reiner’s Stand By Me is just like my story. It is definitely more thrilling, more adventurous and has more likeable characters, but the core is similar. It is about a group of four boys named Gordie, Vern, Teddy and Chris who set out to find the body of a kid. But the plot, isn’t about it at all. It is the experience of teenage and friendship that is at the forefront of the story.

Stephen King is like the Martin Scorsese of writing. Whatever Scorsese and King create are works of art, but it is art that penetrates the mind of both the critic and the plebeian. Nor Bela Tarr or Micheal Bay are great. One is loved by critics and one is loved by the audience, but both never get the love of the both. But, King does. And better, all his books are viable screenplays. Reiner’s Stand by Me is another addition to the collection of great movies inspired by King’s works like The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile, Carrie and what not.

First of all, what a performance by Will Wheaton. I have never been a Star Trek fan and I pretty sure I will never be, but I have known Wheaton from his cameos on The Big Bang Theory and loved them. But never would I have guessed, such range ! Wheaton is perfect here and so are River Phoenix and Jerry O’Connell and Corey Feldman. I can vouch for the fact that this is the greatest portrayal of teenage friendship amongst boys in film history.

People think that boys smoke, drink, play cards, flirt because they are trying to be cool. This movie demolishes that false propaganda. It shows these for what they really mean to boys :- They are just trying to somehow get through this period. It is a period where various responsibilities fall on their shoulders. ‘Study, you are gonna be the future bread earner‘, ‘Get a hot chick or you are gonna feel low and die lonely‘ are the thoughts that meander through every teenage boy’s mind and these are catalysts to get through them. Not that I am justifying it, but still..

Another thing that amazed me about this movie is that in the inception of the movie, they portray these four as the typical bad-gang, smoking, playing cards and all that but as the movie progresses, their hardness is peeled of gradually, and we see them for what they really are, emotionally turmoiled human beings who, now having seen how vast the world can be, are scared of it. They are scared that not every one becomes a football player, not everyone gets into college, not every one becomes successful. They feel as if they are failures in their life, even before they have even lived it. It is an uplifting story, because towards the end, they have eradicated that fears. They learn to stand up for themselves. More importantly, they become crystal clear that someone will stand by them.

Stand By Me is a definitive portrayal of teen angst, and male friendship and more than that I think, it wants to convey that, sometimes, even though it may make no sense (like setting out to find a dead body), we have to get lost to find ourselves. In the end, the older Gordie says ‘I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve. Jesus, does anyone ?’ In my story, the age would be 14. But, boy do I realize, ain’t that a grand story I have to tell.

Rating :- 9.5 / 10

THANKS FOR READING. IF YOU HAVE LIKED/HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS / HAVE ANY  DOUBTS, PLEASE SHARE. I WILL RESPOND TO IT AS SOON AS I CAN. AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE. YOU CAN FOLLOW ME ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE TOOhttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Demanded-Critical-Reviews/1565666967024477?ref=hlYOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL ME ON castlebang786@gmail.com OR favebook2011@rediffmail.com

Photo Rights : Google Images, Wikipedia

Copyright : All written content on this site, unless otherwise noted, has been created by the website owner. As such, the content is the property of the website owner. This content is protected by Indian and international copyright laws. If you wish to reproduce, re-post, or display any of our content on your own site please only do so if you also provide a link back to the source page on this website and properly attribute authorship. Our preference is that you seek our permission before doing so. If you see anything on this website that has not been properly attributed to its originator please contact me. In response, I will attempt to correct the attribution of the offending material or remove and/or replace it. All material on this website is posted in accordance with the limitations set forward by the Information Technology Act, 2000. If a documented copyright owner so requests, their material will be removed from published display, although the author reserves the right to provide linkage to that material or to a source for that material. As a website devoted to discussing and reviewing movies and television I will at times, for illustrative purposes, present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available  for purposes such as criticism, comment, and research. The website owner believes that this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material because the articles published on this website are distributed for entertainment purposes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Su Su Sudhi Vathmeekam Review

There is a scene in which after undergoing speech therapy, Sudhi gives a speech in his school. After finishing the speech, there is a moment of relief on his face. Eyes moistened, face smiling as if he had undergone some kind of redemption. It is one of the most emotionally charged moments I have seen in recent cinema history and left an imprint on my mind.

I haven’t seen a movie for a long time which has had an impact on my life as this one. It is one of those harrowing, emotional experiences that come rarely in movie-watching experiences.

As a nerd, I have always had problems. And no, no one teases me or anything like that. As a nerd, the biggest problem is you have difficulty in expressing yourself. Your mind is filled with ideas about so many topics and no cares to listen about them. I related to this movie. It is about a man who struggles to get through life normally because of his stuttering problem. But what is it really about ? It is about a man who is frustrated with the fact that although he is intelligent, he cannot express himself.

If it was a movie about stuttering, it would have been a huge failure. But it is about the incapability of expressing oneself. It never exploits the stuttering part as well, nor is it exploited to bring about emotions. It is shown as a problem. The movie has emotionally charged moments which will definitely bring you to tears. The performance by Jayasurya is one for the books. What a great balanced portrayal it is ! The chemistry between TG Ravi and KPAC Lalitha is endearing.

Movie is humorous in nature and has plenty of laugh out loud scenes. There are particularly two vertigo shots that completely change the dynamics of the movie and this camera technique hasn’t been put to such use since Vertigo itself.

Did I like the movie ? No, I loved it. I think after 20 years, I will still be thinking about this movie. How it changed my perspective about life, how it inspired me, and how it changed my life forever. It is one of those rare cinematic experiences which I can truly, and proudly, hail as great. Su Su Sudhi Vathmeekam is a masterpiece.

 Rating :- 9.5 / 10

THANKS FOR READING. IF YOU HAVE LIKED/HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS / HAVE ANY  DOUBTS, PLEASE SHARE. I WILL RESPOND TO IT AS SOON AS I CAN. AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE. YOU CAN FOLLOW ME ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE TOOhttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Demanded-Critical-Reviews/1565666967024477?ref=hlYOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL ME ON castlebang786@gmail.com OR favebook2011@rediffmail.com

Photo Rights : Google Images, Wikipedia

Copyright : All written content on this site, unless otherwise noted, has been created by the website owner. As such, the content is the property of the website owner. This content is protected by Indian and international copyright laws. If you wish to reproduce, re-post, or display any of our content on your own site please only do so if you also provide a link back to the source page on this website and properly attribute authorship. Our preference is that you seek our permission before doing so. If you see anything on this website that has not been properly attributed to its originator please contact me. In response, I will attempt to correct the attribution of the offending material or remove and/or replace it. All material on this website is posted in accordance with the limitations set forward by the Information Technology Act, 2000. If a documented copyright owner so requests, their material will be removed from published display, although the author reserves the right to provide linkage to that material or to a source for that material. As a website devoted to discussing and reviewing movies and television I will at times, for illustrative purposes, present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available  for purposes such as criticism, comment, and research. The website owner believes that this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material because the articles published on this website are distributed for entertainment purposes.

 

Oru Vadakkan Selfie Review (No Spoilers)

G.Prajith’s Oru Vadakkan is about Umesh Manohar (Nivin Pauly), Shaji (Aju Varghese) and Thankaprasad (Neeraj Madhav) whose daily routine consists of just drinking, having fun, watching movies, and trying to woo girls. For them, it’s all fun and no work. When Umesh’s father tries to force him to join him at his grocery shop, Umesh runs away from his home and gets on a train to Chennai where he plans to pursue a career in film-making. While on the train he meets Daisy (Manjima Mohan) a girl from his village. While all his attempts to woo her fail, he takes a selfie with her without her knowing and sends it to Shaji who spreads around the information that Umesh has run away with Daisy to Chennai to get married. When Umesh returns from Chennai, he gets to know about the lies Shaji has spread and threatens to expose him to the public. So, Shaji accompanies Umesh to another trip to Chennai to find Daisy, where they meet Jack Tracker (Vineeth Srinivasan), a private detective. They hire him and soon they find Daisy, but then, they  uncover a web of lines and a road trip across Tamil Nadu is set into motion to uncover the truth behind this.

By the way I have described the plot people will think it is embedded with spoilers, that is why I informed beforehand that this review is depraved of spoilers. If you have read the whole plot synopsis I have typed, then your basic perception will be that this is some cliche ridden Malayalam with no heart. Believe me, it’s not !

The story begins as it should. As an entertainer. Making us acquainted with its hilarious and unique style was a great move. Very very unique is this movie. Nivin Pauly is natural. Everytime I see him on screen, I forget he is acting. He is the Hugh Grant of Indian cinema. If you go look up Hugh Grant’s Wikipedia page, the following is the description about the actor :-  ‘Hugh Grant approaches his roles like a character actor and attempts to make his acting appear spontaneous. Hallmarks of his comic skills include a nonchalant touch of irony or sarcasm and studied physical mannerisms as well as his precisely-timed dialogue delivery and facial expressions.’

Isn’t that exactly how you would describe Nivin Pauly ? In my opinion, Hugh Grant is one of the greatest actors ever born, and Nivin Pauly is well on the road to become one. Many people may stereotype him. Say that he just does the same thing over and over again ? But everytime he does it, isn’t he well under the skin of his character ? Dialogues are nothing but things that we say ever day. But the way he presents them in such a spontaneous way and with perfect timing ! It doesn’t err in a single scene. It is always enjoyable too see him in the same character over and over again.

Aju Varghese is another person is this movie who has super comic timing. He is in for the fun, and like hell does he give it to the audience. He is superb. Manjima too is very good. Vineeth Srinivasan is not perfect in his comic timing in this movie. I later came to understand that he is made for dramatic roles, not comic ones. This is very apparent in the later half of the movie, when it exposes its emotional core.

MY ROUTINE TOMORROW :

6 : 00 – WAKE UP

6 : 17 – GET OFF THE BED

6 : 25 – START TO BATHE 

6 : 45 – WAKE UP FROM SLEEP IN THE BATHROOM

7 : 10 – GET READY FOR SCHOOL

7 : 15 – CLIMB THE SCHOOL BUS LIKE TOM CRUISE IN ROGUE NATION

7 : 20 – STRANGLE MY FRIEND FOR SAYING THAT THIS MOVIE’S CLIMAX SUCKS

As the movie began, everyone around me was like this is the same shit over and over again. Everybody thought this wasn’t going to end well. A great man once said ‘To say a message, be funny and not gritty’. Since, that quote sucks so badly, you have surely figured that it was said by me, but it holds truth for this movie.

Engaging is the only word that I can use too describe this. It takes its time to set up things considering it is so complicated on paper. And then it begins. Oru Vadakkan Selfie is just like ice in its nature. Ice melts from solid to the form it actually was before, a liquid. This movie is in its heart a drama, it is just given shades of comedy. The hilarity starts to wane off gradually, but still keeps the audience engaged with its occasional one-liners.

And this movie also acted as a litmus paper for judging many of my friends, because it proved many of them are idiots. Almost all of them hated the ending. Why ? Because they can’t appreciate something which has a meaningful end. A socially-prevalent message had crept into this movie without our knowing and is conveyed beautifully in the movie’s climax. And for the first time, the leads don’t get together. It brings such maturity to the table unseen in Malayalam cinema for a very very long time. And the cinematographer deserves a special mention because the movie is visually arresting.

While being a successful comic caper, Oru Vadakkan Selfie is in its heart a beautiful mature drama which delivers a very strong message to the audience at the climax without downplaying it in any way and is definitely a must-watch.

Rating : 9.3 / 10

THANKS FOR READING. IF YOU HAVE LIKED/HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS / HAVE ANY  DOUBTS, PLEASE SHARE. YOU CAN ALSO REQUEST A REVIEW OF A MOVIE OR SITCOM IN THE COMMENTS BELOW. I WILL RESPOND TO IT AS SOON AS I CAN. AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE. YOU CAN FOLLOW ME ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE TOO https://www.facebook.com/pages/Demanded-Critical-Reviews/1565666967024477?ref=hl YOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL ME ON castlebang786@gmail.com OR favebook2011@rediffmail.com

Photo Rights : Google Images, Wikipedia

Copyright : All written content on this site, unless otherwise noted, has been created by the website owner. As such, the content is the property of the website owner. This content is protected by Indian and international copyright laws. If you wish to reproduce, re-post, or display any of our content on your own site please only do so if you also provide a link back to the source page on this website and properly attribute authorship. Our preference is that you seek our permission before doing so. If you see anything on this website that has not been properly attributed to its originator please contact me. In response, I will attempt to correct the attribution of the offending material or remove and/or replace it. All material on this website is posted in accordance with the limitations set forward by the Information Technology Act, 2000. If a documented copyright owner so requests, their material will be removed from published display, although the author reserves the right to provide linkage to that material or to a source for that material. As a website devoted to discussing and reviewing movies and television I will at times, for illustrative purposes, present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available  for purposes such as criticism, comment, and research. The website owner believes that this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material because the articles published on this website are distributed for entertainment purposes.

Lost In Translation Review

Featured image

I just feel so alone, even when I’m surrounded by other people – Charlotte

Sofia Coppola’s Lost In Translation is about Bob Harris (Bill Murray), a yesteryear actor who is in Tokyo to endorse a whiskey brand. Here he meets Charlotte (Scarlett Johansson), a newly-wed who has arrived with her celebrity-photographer husband. A fortunate encounter at a bar brings together Bob and Charlotte and they end up discussing everything from love to commitment and loneliness, and form a bond which is as strong as it gets within the space of a few days.

I will run out of words if I begin to describe Murray’s performance in this movie, and I mean that in a good way. I didn’t see Murray in this movie, I saw Bob. Jake Gyllenhaal and Bill Murray fascinate me every time they are on the screen. It is that they bring so much to the table even while doing so little. Murray’s performance is controlled, to say the least. He just subdues his unlimited ardour and gives us a performance that we won’t ever forget.

And to his competition is Scarlett Johansson. It is unbelievable that she was just 18 when she did Lost In Translation. She had undoubtedly the worst debut imaginable with 1994’s North. But she has given such a great performance in the movie that her critics rapidly transformed into her admirers. Murray is in the limelight and there he shines, but this movie would have been a dull affair if it wasn’t for the energy unleashed by Scarlett’s character.

Sofia Coppola has created very well-sketched characters here. She knows her way around their mannerisms, thoughts, ideologies from A to Z. The work she has done in Lost In Translation definitely overshadows her father’s work because Francis Coppola’s characters could never have had such depth within themselves.

When the first shot is of Scarlett Johansson in a see-through panties, you know this movie is going somewhere ! The next shot is of Bill Murray arriving into Tokyo. As the scene progresses, there is a bedazzling shot of night-time Tokyo. The reaction that was on my face was similar to that of the one on Murray’s face. He was amazed by Tokyo and I was amazed by the fact that Lance Acord could see such beauty and then capture the amazement aroused from that beauty so efficiently. But, the thing was that I and Bob had connected from the first scene itself.

Both of Sofia’s characters have no reason to be lonely, they have faithful life-partners, they are both financially very-well and should be dancing around happily with a smirk always on their faces. But, it is at this juncture that reality kicks in. They both want something more. They want someone who wants or just pretends to listen to their thoughtful ramblings. They want to know that someone cares. It is a battle for existence rather than love.

And both Bob and Charlotte find it in each other. The first time we see Bob and Charlotte, every one of us has the desire that these individuals should be together. But here’s the catch, they share their depravity with each other and satisfy each other’s psychological needs.

The first shot of Charlotte and Bob together is in a lift where they are surrounded by Japanese people. That is the most true depiction of the mindset of both these characters. They are trapped in cell with people who they can’t even communicate with. They are lost in translation.

Bob is the wise guy in the movie. There is a scene in which a Japanese lady comes in Bob’s room and says ,”I have been sent here for a massage. Do you like massages, Bob-san ?” to which Murray replies, “I don’t think I like them anymore”. That is the state Bob has thrusted himself into. A self-confinement where he is depraved of all pleasures and is given enough solace to ponder over the wisdom which has been accumulated within the span of years. But, Charlotte helps to unleash that child within him and brings him back to life as we know it.

When they talk for the first time, the first thing that Charlotte asks is ,”What are you doing here?” to which Murray replies that he is taking a break from his wife. They are brutally frank because there are somethings within a person that they just want to get out and the reason why both of them were in Japan was one of them.

The score is superb. It goes on well with the flowy sequences of the movie. The ending has been debated upon a lot. What were those last words whispered into Charlotte’s ears by Bob ? There is a part of me that wants to know them, but my inner side says, the fun is in not knowing. I am not even sure about the scene itself. Did that really happen or was it just a surrealistic experience ? I don’t know and quite honestly, I don’t want to.

Lost In Translation is a beautifully sketched character study, which touches upon various grim realistic themes yet never stops being witty and acts as the perfect creative space for Coppola, Murray, Scarlett and Lance Acord as well and is undoubtedly, a must watch.

Rating : 9.2 / 10

THANKS FOR READING. IF YOU HAVE LIKED/HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS / HAVE ANY  DOUBTS, PLEASE SHARE. YOU CAN ALSO REQUEST A REVIEW OF A MOVIE OR SITCOM IN THE COMMENTS BELOW. I WILL RESPOND TO IT AS SOON AS I CAN. AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE. YOU CAN FOLLOW ME ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE TOO https://www.facebook.com/pages/Demanded-Critical-Reviews/1565666967024477?ref=hl YOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL ME ON castlebang786@gmail.com OR favebook2011@rediffmail.com

Photo Rights : Google Images, Wikipedia

Copyright : All written content on this site, unless otherwise noted, has been created by the website owner. As such, the content is the property of the website owner. This content is protected by Indian and international copyright laws. If you wish to reproduce, re-post, or display any of our content on your own site please only do so if you also provide a link back to the source page on this website and properly attribute authorship. Our preference is that you seek our permission before doing so. If you see anything on this website that has not been properly attributed to its originator please contact me. In response, I will attempt to correct the attribution of the offending material or remove and/or replace it. All material on this website is posted in accordance with the limitations set forward by the Information Technology Act, 2000. If a documented copyright owner so requests, their material will be removed from published display, although the author reserves the right to provide linkage to that material or to a source for that material. As a website devoted to discussing and reviewing movies and television I will at times, for illustrative purposes, present copyrighted material, the use of which might not always be specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available  for purposes such as criticism, comment, and research. The website owner believes that this constitutes a “fair use” of any such copyrighted material because the articles published on this website are distributed for entertainment purposes.

Piku Review

Featured image

Shoojit Sircar’s Piku is about Piku Banerjee (Deepika Padukone) who lives with her father Bhashkor Banerjee (Amitabh Bachan). Bhashkor struggles with constipation and considers constipation as hazardous as cancer. Bhashkor unintentionally creates problems in Piku’s professional and personal life. Piku wants to sell her ancestral property in Kolkata but Bhashkor prevents her from doing so. To decide about this matter, Piku and Bhashkor go on a road trip to Kolkata with Rana Chaudhary (Irrfan Khan) driving them and also Budhan (Balendra Singh) accompaniying Bhashkor to assist him.

The actors dazzle in their roles. Deepika Padukone and Amitabh Bachan are so realistic in their roles. But the main attraction is Irrfan Khan, who with his controlled performance, infuses the much required energy into the movie. At a point, we even forget that these guys are acting.

The movie begins at a snail pace with scenes dragging on and all the jokes going flat. But, the movie picks up pace at the end of the first half and then it becomes a very entertaining and heart-warming movie. The movie also encounters some deeply philosophical questions such as ‘ Me may developing but we are doing so by uprooting our own roots. Then what is the use of such development ?’ The movie gives enough time for character development which has been absent from Bollywood for a long time. And the movie has brilliant dialogues and has one of the most befitting climaxes in Hindi cinema. We are given to draw up our own lines, which is very satisfactory.

It gives such a stark realistic view of the typical Indian family and has a brilliant layered screenplay. I recently received news that Piku will have a sequel and I am thinking of making a page called ‘PLEASE DON’T SPOIL THIS AND GIVE US CRAP’.

The cinematography and production design of this movie is radiant and is perfect for a family viewing.

Piku is a heartfelt movie which gives ample time for character development and also lives up to is layered screenplay which is further boosted by brilliant performances and is a must-watch.

Rating: 8.7/10

THANKS FOR READING. IF YOU HAVE LIKED/HAVE DIFFERENT VIEWS/HAVE ANY  DOUBTS, PLEASE SHARE. I WILL RESPOND TO IT AS SOON AS I CAN. AND PLEASE SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE. YOU CAN FOLLOW ME ON MY FACEBOOK PAGE TOO https://www.facebook.com/pages/Demanded-Critical-Reviews/1565666967024477?ref=hl YOU CAN ALSO E-MAIL ME ON castlebang786@gmail.com OR favebook2011@rediffmail.com.